🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."